International Journal of Homoeopathic Sciences

Pathological rubrics form an essential bridge between conventional clinical pathology and homeopathic symptom analysis. Their inclusion in repertories enhances the accuracy of remedy selection, particularly in chronic, complex, or non-communicative cases where objective pathological signs dominate the clinical picture. This review traces the historical development of pathological rubrics from early Hahnemannian principles through the contributions of Boenninghausen, Kent, Boger, and modern repertories. A clear classification including disease rubrics, tissue changes, pathological generals, nosological rubrics, and diatheses is presented to support practical understanding. Their value in differential diagnosis, remedy confirmation, and integration with clinical diagnostic findings is highlighted, alongside limitations related to over-reliance, incomplete rubric representation, and loss of individualization. The article emphasizes the need for rubric standardization to strengthen digital repertories and improve clinical coherence. when used judiciously and blended with general and mental symptoms, Pathological rubrics significantly enhance the precision and relevance of homeopathic practice in modern healthcare settings.